The ideas presented by Mary Hickman in his work, ‘The Effects of Media Globalization’, can be mainly
summarized as follows. Media globalization has many benefits, like improving
people’s quality of lives. However, it is misused by some multinational media
corporations to pursuit their profits. They only convey the information they
want people to know and block the rest. As a result, though the number of media
keeps increasing, people are not even better informed than before. Only the
governments can regulate media, but they let big corporations and media merge
freely. The idea of free market creates monopoly-like super corporations in the
end.
When the author wrote about increasing advertising in media, she mentioned
the Coca-Cola’s case, which showed how powerful can large corporations be. Since
the income of newspaper mainly comes from advertising, advertisers play a vital
role in diciding what kind of news can be put on the newspaper. I agree with
the author that it is a terrifying phenomenon as media can be very influential
on one’s mind. Many people who read news every day believe they are well informed,
but a number of them accept the news they read without filtering or judging. As
a result, they put themselves under the control of media unconsciously. It is very
dangerous to let the minority manipulate thoughts of the public and even shape
a culture.
In conclusion, media globalization itself is beneficial to human. It can
make people’s lives easier and more convenient. However, at the same time, it
can be a powerful ‘mind control’ machine. Large corporations could convey
misleading messages to the public through it. From my point of view, its
disadvantage outweighs the benefits it brings, and media globalization should
be regulated by goverments.